set trader
U-Wing Microfighter, photo 1 of 175160Star Wars · 2017Retired 2018

What it sells for on Set Trader

Median completed sale, last 180 days, by grade.

GradeSoldSalesvs RRP
SSealed
—0—
AComplete, boxed
—0—
BComplete, no box
—0—
CComplete, no instructions
—0—
DIncomplete
—0—
XSold as seen
—0—

No completed sales yet. Prices will appear here as sets sell.

0 collectors want this set. Want it to get alerts when it's listed, gets cheaper or is retiring
Set 75160 · Star Wars

U-Wing Microfighter

Compare
UK RRP£8.99Pieces109Price per piece8.2p below theme avgMinifigures1Age6+Retired31 Dec 2018Rating3.8★ (4)

Nobody is selling this set right now

Add it to your wanted list and sellers who own it will see the demand.

Set details

Set number
75160
Theme
Star Wars › MicroFighters
Year
2017
Pieces
109
Minifigures
1
Age
6–12
UK RRP
£8.99
US / EU RRP
$9.99 / €9.99
UK launch
16 Dec 2016
UK retirement
31 Dec 2018
Availability
Retail
Packaging
Box
Box size
14.097 × 12.192 × 4.5974 cm
Weight
0.09979024 kg
Barcode
EAN 5702015866484 · UPC 673419265164
Rating
3.8 out of 5 from 4 Brickset reviews
Collectors
Owned by 12,221, wanted by 2,166 Brickset members
About this set

Play out miniature LEGO® Star Wars adventures with this U-Wing Microfighter, featuring folding wings, two stud shooters and space to seat the included U-Wing Pilot with his blaster pistol. Includes a U-Wing Pilot minifigure. Features folding wings, two stud shooters, thruster engines at the back and an open cockpit with space for a minifigure to sit. Fold the wings and fire the stud shooters to repel the enemy. Also includes the U-Wing Pilot's blaster pistol. This set offers an age-appropriate build and play experience for ages 6-12. Recreate your own scenes from the blockbuster movie Star Wars: Rogue One. Measures over 1” (3cm) high, 4” (12cm) long and 2” (6cm) wide.

Minifigures (1)

Check minifigures carefully when buying used: they're part of the grade.

Set data from Rebrickable, Brickset (LEGO.com UK prices and dates), checked today. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.